It works perfectly for arab dictators to feed the Middle East conflict since it rises oil prices. Let's be real, palestinian people are those arabs who never existed as a nation. They were created by arab dictators to raise oil prices.
Since there are more than a million arabs fully integrated in israeli society, there is nothing else to discuss with these media created palestinian people. What is their own history, language, culture, that differ from their arab neighbours?
quarta-feira, 17 de março de 2010
terça-feira, 10 de novembro de 2009
War or Peace in Middle East
This is the title of Nobel Prize Laureate in Economic Sciences Robert J. Aumann. He studied the war from game theory perspective.
Concessions teach the other side that beligerant attitude is working and producing results. It is this mechanism that strenghten beligerancy, until it looks and feels like war. This rationale is present in many examples in human history of warfare. Here are a couple of them:
Concessions teach the other side that beligerant attitude is working and producing results. It is this mechanism that strenghten beligerancy, until it looks and feels like war. This rationale is present in many examples in human history of warfare. Here are a couple of them:
- Second World War: Neville Chamberlain, former british prime minister, known for appeasement foreign policy, signed Munich Agreement in 1938, conceding Czechoslovakia to Hitler;
- Gaza War: Israeli troops expelled all citizens from Gaza, conceded the Gaza Strip to non-israeli citizens, and received 8 years of rockets targeted against civilian population, shot by the non-israeli citizens of Gaza.;
Jim Tobins, also awarded the Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, affirmed that Economics is all about incentives. The logic here is that concessions is translated by the other side as incentives.
Robert J. Aumann discussed about concessions. In his lecture, one man and one woman were deciding whether both she and the man will receive the same ammount, namely 10, or she will receive ten times more, and the man will receive 10 times less.
Man =10
Woman = 10
Or:
Man = 10 / 10 (ten times less) = 1
Woman = 10 x 10 (ten times more) = 100
The man thought to concede to the woman, because of discount rate (%). The ammount of 100 will be close to the ammount of 1 after many cycles of discount rate. It is like keeping your 100 dollars bill for many years. It will be hard for you to buy a chewing gum after all this period of time.
Everybody has his/her own discount rate. Discount rates are based on time. There will be a point in time, that without conceding - thus avoiding war, an equilibrium will be reached without concessions, without war, and this time is sooner than waiting for many years to come.
domingo, 4 de outubro de 2009
During the day, the time zone works for eastern countries, but during the night it works for western countries.
When PA talks to US, everybody is sleeping, it is late at night. Only when the insomnia reigns, the West wakes up, to listen to the East. Does it remind you Barack Obama? The ones who don't go to sleep, avoid waking up.
There is a speech for West, under day light, but another speech for East, during the dark times, dark ages. During the day, Easterns keep on covering themselves to avoid light.
There is a speech for West, under day light, but another speech for East, during the dark times, dark ages. During the day, Easterns keep on covering themselves to avoid light.
sábado, 19 de setembro de 2009
Is U.N. membership qualified for dictatorial regimes?
There is an artificial entity with all its bureaucratic internal processes, pumping one-sided reports instead of promoting peace and freedom.
Since dictatorships sign UN articles reporting on freedom of speech, here we find hypocrisy. It is not enough to stamp UN logo. Handling of UN logo should only be permitted by democracies and free countries.
Since dictatorships sign UN articles reporting on freedom of speech, here we find hypocrisy. It is not enough to stamp UN logo. Handling of UN logo should only be permitted by democracies and free countries.
quarta-feira, 8 de julho de 2009
The media-made palestinian state - the true history
(extracted from Jerusalem Post - article written by TILMAN TARACH)
Jordan's territory is more than four times Israel's, and its population density is only one sixth of Israel's. The majority of the Palestinian refugees who fled during the wars of 1948 and 1967 live in Jordan, and about 60 percent of all Jordanians call themselves Palestinians. Until 1967, the West Bank was occupied by Jordan: it was actually formally annexed, and the Palestinian Arabs living there were considered Jordanians (and, even today, they often hold a Jordanian passport). But, tellingly, none of them called for an intifada against Jordan to create a Palestinian state in the West Bank, and none of the Palestinian Arabs ever fought against the Egyptians in Gaza, who had occupied the Gaza Strip since 1948. The fighting has always and exclusively been directed against Israel's existence.
When the PLO was founded in 1964, it did not call for the liberation of the territories occupied by Jordan and Egypt, but for the destruction of Israel; nobody within the PLO talked about a Palestinian state at that time, not even Ahmed Shukeiri, until 1967 chairman of the PLO. In Article 24 of its 1964 Charter, the PLO still explicitly renounced any sovereignty claims to the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The strategy did not change until after 1967, when these territories were no longer occupied by Jordan or Egypt but by Israel. As early as in 1965, the PLO boasted of having killed 35 Jews, and the number increased as the years went on.
This shows the dishonesty of the lamentation, repeated like a mantra, that the assaults on Jews are only a reaction to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, which took place only in the course of the Six Day War.
As is well known, that very same year Israel offered to negotiate the return of all the occupied territories in exchange for genuine peace, but at the Khartoum Conference the Arab states answered with the famous triple "no": "no" to peace with Israel, "no" to recognition of Israel, "no" to negotiations with Israel. Tunisian president Habib Bourguiba was the only Arab leader who, as early as 1965, supported an agreement with Israel. The Khartoum Conference restated the old position of the notorious mufti of Jerusalem: Not an inch of sacred Muslim soil would be allowed to make up a sovereign Jewish state. In this context, it should be recalled that Jimmy Carter was the first to propose a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip; not until then did the PLO seize this suggestion.
In reality, the only viable option, which not even the Palestinians can raise reasonable objections against, is the following: The West Bank (or large parts of it) is united with Jordan, and Gaza with Egypt. (When, in February 2008, the Palestinians overran the Egyptian border fortifications into Sinai, their rallying cry, addressed to the Egyptians, was: "We are one people.")
According to surveys, 30% of Palestinians living in the West Bank are in favor of such a solution. But it meets with resistance from the Hashemite dynasty of Jordan, which fears for the loss of the throne; it therefore renounced any territorial claims to the West Bank back in 1988. As reported by the Jordanian newspaper Al-Ghad, King Abdullah considered a confederation between Jordan and the West Bank a "conspiracy against his kingdom and against the Palestinians."
All the well-known Palestinian groups demonize such a plan: The creation of a second Palestinian state next to Jordan has always been just a pretense for them to conceal their anti-Israel policies, and the recognition of Jordan enlarged by the West Bank as the state of the Palestinians would deprive them of this pretense.
Their real objective has always been the destruction of Israel and, with their phony anger at the "Zionist arrogance," they would still pursue this goal even if the Jews of Israel retreated all the way to Masada or Tel Aviv.
Jordan's territory is more than four times Israel's, and its population density is only one sixth of Israel's. The majority of the Palestinian refugees who fled during the wars of 1948 and 1967 live in Jordan, and about 60 percent of all Jordanians call themselves Palestinians. Until 1967, the West Bank was occupied by Jordan: it was actually formally annexed, and the Palestinian Arabs living there were considered Jordanians (and, even today, they often hold a Jordanian passport). But, tellingly, none of them called for an intifada against Jordan to create a Palestinian state in the West Bank, and none of the Palestinian Arabs ever fought against the Egyptians in Gaza, who had occupied the Gaza Strip since 1948. The fighting has always and exclusively been directed against Israel's existence.
When the PLO was founded in 1964, it did not call for the liberation of the territories occupied by Jordan and Egypt, but for the destruction of Israel; nobody within the PLO talked about a Palestinian state at that time, not even Ahmed Shukeiri, until 1967 chairman of the PLO. In Article 24 of its 1964 Charter, the PLO still explicitly renounced any sovereignty claims to the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The strategy did not change until after 1967, when these territories were no longer occupied by Jordan or Egypt but by Israel. As early as in 1965, the PLO boasted of having killed 35 Jews, and the number increased as the years went on.
This shows the dishonesty of the lamentation, repeated like a mantra, that the assaults on Jews are only a reaction to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, which took place only in the course of the Six Day War.
As is well known, that very same year Israel offered to negotiate the return of all the occupied territories in exchange for genuine peace, but at the Khartoum Conference the Arab states answered with the famous triple "no": "no" to peace with Israel, "no" to recognition of Israel, "no" to negotiations with Israel. Tunisian president Habib Bourguiba was the only Arab leader who, as early as 1965, supported an agreement with Israel. The Khartoum Conference restated the old position of the notorious mufti of Jerusalem: Not an inch of sacred Muslim soil would be allowed to make up a sovereign Jewish state. In this context, it should be recalled that Jimmy Carter was the first to propose a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip; not until then did the PLO seize this suggestion.
In reality, the only viable option, which not even the Palestinians can raise reasonable objections against, is the following: The West Bank (or large parts of it) is united with Jordan, and Gaza with Egypt. (When, in February 2008, the Palestinians overran the Egyptian border fortifications into Sinai, their rallying cry, addressed to the Egyptians, was: "We are one people.")
According to surveys, 30% of Palestinians living in the West Bank are in favor of such a solution. But it meets with resistance from the Hashemite dynasty of Jordan, which fears for the loss of the throne; it therefore renounced any territorial claims to the West Bank back in 1988. As reported by the Jordanian newspaper Al-Ghad, King Abdullah considered a confederation between Jordan and the West Bank a "conspiracy against his kingdom and against the Palestinians."
All the well-known Palestinian groups demonize such a plan: The creation of a second Palestinian state next to Jordan has always been just a pretense for them to conceal their anti-Israel policies, and the recognition of Jordan enlarged by the West Bank as the state of the Palestinians would deprive them of this pretense.
Their real objective has always been the destruction of Israel and, with their phony anger at the "Zionist arrogance," they would still pursue this goal even if the Jews of Israel retreated all the way to Masada or Tel Aviv.
sexta-feira, 29 de maio de 2009
Por que o rei árabe não gosta de Israel.
Israel e o Ocidente, prezam os valores humanistas e os 10 mandamentos.
Ninguém tem raiva de Israel. Na verdade é um conflito pessoal interno do mundo árabe que não tem ego individual e sim, existe apenas como parte de um coletivo. Israel preza pelo ego individual e defesa dos valores democráticos.
Valores democráticos não conseguem existir no mundo árabe pois eles vivem organizados por clãs, e a união de grupos de famílias árabes acaba gerando uma polaridade, um dos pró e outro dos contra, somente dois grupos, como os pólos de um imã.
Se o povo árabe oprimido pudesse opinar, eles iriam na hora derrubar o seu rei, que oprime as mulheres, reprime a liberdade de expressão, persegue os homossexuais, restringe acesso à cultura e à educação.
O rei árabe, claro, vai direcionar esta tensão social contra o inimigo externo, exógeno, e nomeia este ser virtual, incutido no imaginário do povo coletivo, de uma entidade, a "entidade sionista". Assim, o rei une o povo, coletivamente, contra um objetivo comum, e assim, se mantém no poder.
Mas fica cada vez mais difícil para o árabe continuar imerso neste pensamento fantasioso, pois o acesso à Internet, TVs a cabo, e-mail, aumenta a capacidade crítica sobre a fantasia.
Não há uma guerra contra Israel, há sim um conflito de valores, que estão se manifestando a nível geo-político, atravessa países do mundo, e aparecem em lugares como Paquistão versus Talibã, piratas na Somália.
O exercício militar que envolve o preparo da população contra ataque de inimigos, é tão importante quanto ter armas militares para se defender. E Israel é forte por isto, possui uma coordenação intrinseca no povo do elemento militar (proteção) e civil (proteção através dos serviços públicos de saúde, educação, transporte, etc).
Ninguém tem raiva de Israel. Na verdade é um conflito pessoal interno do mundo árabe que não tem ego individual e sim, existe apenas como parte de um coletivo. Israel preza pelo ego individual e defesa dos valores democráticos.
Valores democráticos não conseguem existir no mundo árabe pois eles vivem organizados por clãs, e a união de grupos de famílias árabes acaba gerando uma polaridade, um dos pró e outro dos contra, somente dois grupos, como os pólos de um imã.
Se o povo árabe oprimido pudesse opinar, eles iriam na hora derrubar o seu rei, que oprime as mulheres, reprime a liberdade de expressão, persegue os homossexuais, restringe acesso à cultura e à educação.
O rei árabe, claro, vai direcionar esta tensão social contra o inimigo externo, exógeno, e nomeia este ser virtual, incutido no imaginário do povo coletivo, de uma entidade, a "entidade sionista". Assim, o rei une o povo, coletivamente, contra um objetivo comum, e assim, se mantém no poder.
Mas fica cada vez mais difícil para o árabe continuar imerso neste pensamento fantasioso, pois o acesso à Internet, TVs a cabo, e-mail, aumenta a capacidade crítica sobre a fantasia.
Não há uma guerra contra Israel, há sim um conflito de valores, que estão se manifestando a nível geo-político, atravessa países do mundo, e aparecem em lugares como Paquistão versus Talibã, piratas na Somália.
O exercício militar que envolve o preparo da população contra ataque de inimigos, é tão importante quanto ter armas militares para se defender. E Israel é forte por isto, possui uma coordenação intrinseca no povo do elemento militar (proteção) e civil (proteção através dos serviços públicos de saúde, educação, transporte, etc).
terça-feira, 26 de maio de 2009
Several warships from all around the world gather together in Gulf of Aden
In order to take ships from Asia and Middle East to Europe, piracy in Gulf of Aden force shippers to change routes that run through the Suez Canal. It sounds crazy to have to go all around Africa to get to Europe.Military navy from various countries are gathering together at the Gulf of Aden, with a common purpose, catch the pirates around Somalia, an area 3 times the size of Mediterranean Sea.
Patrolling warships from Greece, Iran, Germany, US, Portugal, Canada, Russia, Australia, India, France, China, Denmark, Italy, Turkey, South Korea and United Kingdom, are trying to eliminate this piracy infection in international waters.
Even unfriendly nations join efforts against piracy: a South Korean helicopter rescued North Korean crew.
domingo, 24 de maio de 2009
Lavrov met Mashaal, Hamas gang chief in Damasco. Why is that?
If the Quartet, US, EU, UN, and Russia, perceive Hamas as a terrorist organization, why did Sergey Lavrov talk to Mashaal?
Does Russia intend to exit the Quartet? What does Sergey Lavrov have in mind?
Far enough, let's check some of Russian's foreign ministry Sergey Lavrov activities during this May:
- visits to Syria and Lebanon
- talks with Egyptian Minister of Foreign Affairs Ahmed Aboul Gheit
- talks with Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Avigdor Lieberman by telephone
- meeting with Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs Ahmet Davutoglu
So, the last 2 weeks Sergey Lavrov had Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Israel and Turkey in mind.
Lieberman will be in Moscow next June.
A Russian planned international Middle East peace conference is in the cooking.
I am dreaming that Russia is convincing Hamas to:
- accept Israel as Jewish state;
- conciliate with the Palestinian Authority (under Egyptian auspices);
- leave Syria to join the PA in Ramallah;
Syria and Turkey area clearing up their path to align with Iran. No problem with Russia, right Mr. Lavrov?
Does Russia intend to exit the Quartet? What does Sergey Lavrov have in mind?
Far enough, let's check some of Russian's foreign ministry Sergey Lavrov activities during this May:
- visits to Syria and Lebanon
- talks with Egyptian Minister of Foreign Affairs Ahmed Aboul Gheit
- talks with Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Avigdor Lieberman by telephone
- meeting with Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs Ahmet Davutoglu
So, the last 2 weeks Sergey Lavrov had Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Israel and Turkey in mind.
Lieberman will be in Moscow next June.
A Russian planned international Middle East peace conference is in the cooking.
I am dreaming that Russia is convincing Hamas to:
- accept Israel as Jewish state;
- conciliate with the Palestinian Authority (under Egyptian auspices);
- leave Syria to join the PA in Ramallah;
Syria and Turkey area clearing up their path to align with Iran. No problem with Russia, right Mr. Lavrov?
domingo, 17 de maio de 2009
A fronteira entre os curdos e os xiitas
Nos mapas ao lado:- verde-claro = SUNITAS
- verde-escuro = XIITAS
- vermelho = CURDOS
Os curdos estão representados pelas áreas vermelhas do mapa. Eles se concentram basicamente nas fronteiras terrestres dos xiitas iranianos. Impressiona a localização dos curdos sempre adjacentes às àreas limítrofes de xiitas, até no Afeganistão.
Será que para prever o radicalismo xiita expansionista para além das áreas satélites no Líbano/Síria/Iraque/Afeganistão, devemos observar a relação entre xiitas e curdos?
quinta-feira, 7 de maio de 2009
O ministro das Relações Exteriores Celso Amorim quer vender urânio para o seu amigo Ahmadinejad ?
Curioso, Celso Amorim quer presidir a Agência Internacional de Energia Atômica (AIEA) e fiscalizar assim o uso da energia nuclear no Irã e mundo afora. Ele já se candidatou.
Interessante que os russos andaram fazendo prospecção aqui no Brasil e encontraram pelo menos um décimo das 300.000 toneladas de urânio debaixo do solo brasileiro . E mesmo assim, o Ahmadinejad cancelou sua visita ?
O Brasil reclamou de Israel na Comissão de Direitos Humanos da ONU em 2006 e ficou mudo com relação aos massacres no Sudão das milícias protegidas pelo governo em Darfur.
Há 17 anos que nenhum chanceler brasileiro visitava o Irã. A última visita de Amorim ao Irã nesse novembro de 2008 rompeu com este quadro. Foi durante esta visita que ele fez o convite ao Ahmadinejad e sua delegação de empresários.
Interessante que os russos andaram fazendo prospecção aqui no Brasil e encontraram pelo menos um décimo das 300.000 toneladas de urânio debaixo do solo brasileiro . E mesmo assim, o Ahmadinejad cancelou sua visita ?
O Brasil reclamou de Israel na Comissão de Direitos Humanos da ONU em 2006 e ficou mudo com relação aos massacres no Sudão das milícias protegidas pelo governo em Darfur.
Há 17 anos que nenhum chanceler brasileiro visitava o Irã. A última visita de Amorim ao Irã nesse novembro de 2008 rompeu com este quadro. Foi durante esta visita que ele fez o convite ao Ahmadinejad e sua delegação de empresários.
domingo, 3 de maio de 2009
Belarus vende armas russas "high tech" para Irã
O que Belarus faz? Compra da Rússia e gera uma nova transação, vende para o Irã. Se o Ocidente reclama para a Rússia, a Russia fala que vendeu para Belarus. Simples. Vale lembrar, mais uma hipocrisia.O Irã quer os mísseis terra-ar S-3000, terríveis contra os ataques aéreos. Incomoda mesmo. Mas já está se abastecendo de mísseis de superfície Iskander-M "made in Belarus". Os S-3000 estão a caminho. Assim o diga a delegação de Ahmadinejad pelo mundo afora, fazendo compras.
(Primeira foto: S-3000 Segunda foto: Iskander)
terça-feira, 28 de abril de 2009
Possível acordo militar entre EUA e Irã: tropas americanas em território iraniano
Mais um sinal que os EUA começam a se curvar ao Irã nuclear:A proposta é de tornar a base aérea americana de Al Udeid, no Qatar, o local de partida principal dos aviões americanos de transporte sobre o golfo Pérsico, atravessando a fronteira iraniana e voando sobre o sul e centro do Irã, até o destino final, a base aérea americana perto de Kandahar, no sul do Afeganistão.
A rota marítima iria incluir a principal base naval da Guarda Revolucionária iraniana em Chah-Bahar, que está situada no mar das Arábias, próximo à fronteira do Irã com o Paquistão.
A base naval de Chah-Bahar possui duas seções: um porto civil para pequenas embarcações oriundas da Índia e do Paquistão, e uma instalação militar nova, ágil, e moderna, onde estão estacionados os submarinos iranianos (de um total de 6 unidades).Os planejadores militares americanos qualificaram esta seção de Chah-Bahar um porto ideal para que suprimentos americanos cheguem ao Afeganistão através de uma rota predominantemente marítima.
A partir deste porto do Mar das Arábias, os suprimentos se dirigiriam para o norte, através de Sistan-va-Baluchistan até a fronteira onde o Irã, o Pakistão e o Afeganistão se intersectam e então se dirigem ao leste por comboios até os seus destinos finais em Kandahar.
(extraído e traduzido de http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=6048)
quinta-feira, 23 de abril de 2009
Egyptian MP urges pilgrimage to Jerusalem
Minister of Religious Endowments Mohammed Hamdi Zaqzuq was quoted by the Al-Masri Al-Youm newspaper as saying:
"Just as Muslims go on pilgrimage... to Mecca, they should also go to Jerusalem and to the Al-Aksa Mosque by the hundreds of thousands every year".
Jerusalem is not mentioned in whole Koran It is amazing.
Moslems pray towards Mecca, and they give their back to Jerusalem. Jerusalem was never mentioned in the Koran. NEVER MENTIONED.
Jerusalem is in almost every jewish pray, and there are no prays in Islam mentioning a word about Jerusalem.
A message to Mohammed Hamdi Zaqzuq and his supporters: "Stop looking at Israel and start looking at your own bellies!"
"Just as Muslims go on pilgrimage... to Mecca, they should also go to Jerusalem and to the Al-Aksa Mosque by the hundreds of thousands every year".
Jerusalem is not mentioned in whole Koran It is amazing.
Moslems pray towards Mecca, and they give their back to Jerusalem. Jerusalem was never mentioned in the Koran. NEVER MENTIONED.
Jerusalem is in almost every jewish pray, and there are no prays in Islam mentioning a word about Jerusalem.
A message to Mohammed Hamdi Zaqzuq and his supporters: "Stop looking at Israel and start looking at your own bellies!"
terça-feira, 21 de abril de 2009
Swiss bank numbered accounts protect terrorism and illicit drug money
In regards to Ahmadinejad and Swiss president private meeting held at Durban II U.N. conference
How come a bank account is numbered and doesn't require a name owner? Who invented this absurd? This is why iranian major sponsor of terrorism and Swiss president hug each other, thanking each other for the speedy flow of money that supports terrorism, and opium traffic. Switzerland is neutral ? Come on, another hipocrisy in this crazy world. Arght!!!!
How come a bank account is numbered and doesn't require a name owner? Who invented this absurd? This is why iranian major sponsor of terrorism and Swiss president hug each other, thanking each other for the speedy flow of money that supports terrorism, and opium traffic. Switzerland is neutral ? Come on, another hipocrisy in this crazy world. Arght!!!!
sexta-feira, 10 de abril de 2009
The mirror effect
If a person with low self esteem looks in the mirror, he/she either wants to break the mirror, in order to get rid of his//her self image, or get rid of him/herself by wearing suicide belts. Does it remind you of something that is happening in the Middle East?
Let's distribute mirrors to arab dictatorships. What about telling islamofascists that Israel is not a mirror, instead, is a true reality?
Let's distribute mirrors to arab dictatorships. What about telling islamofascists that Israel is not a mirror, instead, is a true reality?
quinta-feira, 2 de abril de 2009
Netanyahu toma posse como primeiro ministro
Obama felicita Netanyahu e Putin convida-o a uma visita a Moscou.
Netanyahu afirma que Israel nunca ratificou o processo de paz de Annapolis e etsta comprometido apenas com processo de paz do Roadmap.
Afirma Natanyahu:
- "Diplomacia e sanções podem funcionar, mas caso contrário, Israel pode ser forçado ao recurso de um ataque militar às instalações nuclares da República do Irã."
- "A paz com os sirios independe do Golan."
Avigdor Lieberman ocupa o Ministério do Exterior.
Egito exige que Lieberman peça desculpas por discursar na Knesset (Outubro 2008) :
"De tempos em tempos nossos líderes vão visitar Mubarak no Egito, mas ele nunca concordou em vir para cá numa visita oficial como presidente. Todo líder com auto respeito teria feito destes encontros uma condição de reciprocidade. Se ele quer falar conosco, ele deveria vir aqui, se ele não quer vir aqui, ele que vá para o inferno".
Netanyahu afirma que Israel nunca ratificou o processo de paz de Annapolis e etsta comprometido apenas com processo de paz do Roadmap.
Afirma Natanyahu:
- "Diplomacia e sanções podem funcionar, mas caso contrário, Israel pode ser forçado ao recurso de um ataque militar às instalações nuclares da República do Irã."
- "A paz com os sirios independe do Golan."
Avigdor Lieberman ocupa o Ministério do Exterior.
Egito exige que Lieberman peça desculpas por discursar na Knesset (Outubro 2008) :
"De tempos em tempos nossos líderes vão visitar Mubarak no Egito, mas ele nunca concordou em vir para cá numa visita oficial como presidente. Todo líder com auto respeito teria feito destes encontros uma condição de reciprocidade. Se ele quer falar conosco, ele deveria vir aqui, se ele não quer vir aqui, ele que vá para o inferno".
quarta-feira, 18 de março de 2009
Peace with Syria?
Hafez al-Assad ruled the country for 3 decades.
After decades of coups and counter-coups, He was succeeded by his son and current president Bashar al-Assad in 2000.
Now, let`s make peace with Syria, not with this dictator. His words do not represent even the Syrian curds. Only Alawite money.Therefore, it is time to wait for a free Syria without Syrian support for terrorism.
After decades of coups and counter-coups, He was succeeded by his son and current president Bashar al-Assad in 2000.
Now, let`s make peace with Syria, not with this dictator. His words do not represent even the Syrian curds. Only Alawite money.Therefore, it is time to wait for a free Syria without Syrian support for terrorism.
Durban II' draft drops Israel criticism
It is an absurd we have to celebrate when UN do the right thing
The things are so upside down with UN that we come up with the absurd that when the right and true comes up everybody celebrate and it becomes news in the press. It is obvious that for many years UN is biased toward the oil rich arab countries who use Israel to divert their oppressed people towards a collective enemy and brainwash them to avoid pursue their own free thoughts and self esteem.
As usual, humanity is keen to adopt fascist thoughts to get rid of their own ego. Israel is an example of democracy, equality and freedom to world. And the absurd that is this UN oil corrupted forum.
The things are so upside down with UN that we come up with the absurd that when the right and true comes up everybody celebrate and it becomes news in the press. It is obvious that for many years UN is biased toward the oil rich arab countries who use Israel to divert their oppressed people towards a collective enemy and brainwash them to avoid pursue their own free thoughts and self esteem.
As usual, humanity is keen to adopt fascist thoughts to get rid of their own ego. Israel is an example of democracy, equality and freedom to world. And the absurd that is this UN oil corrupted forum.
quinta-feira, 12 de março de 2009
Venezuela government: We're honored Israel expelled our diplomats
What about Wayuu tribe Venezuela is forcing to be islamic terrorists? In addition to supporting terror and anti-semitism, Hugo Chavez imported iranian islamists to train indians from Amazon region to become terrorists, forcing Wayuu group of indians and the Guajiros group to wear islamic burkas, and training its men how to use Kalashnikov machine guns, use suicide belts.
See article from Jose Brechner from Bolivia, with horrific pictures. What about the official creation of Hezbollah political party in Venezuela called "Partido Politico Militar Islamico de America Latina Hezbollah"? (translation: Militar and Political Islamic South America Party Hezbollah". This party is operating in El Salvador, Nicaragua, and indians "Quechuas and Aimaras" from Bolivia.
See article from Jose Brechner from Bolivia, with horrific pictures. What about the official creation of Hezbollah political party in Venezuela called "Partido Politico Militar Islamico de America Latina Hezbollah"? (translation: Militar and Political Islamic South America Party Hezbollah". This party is operating in El Salvador, Nicaragua, and indians "Quechuas and Aimaras" from Bolivia.
1 million israeli arabs vote in Israel
I am fed up with this hipocrisy. 1 million arabs vote in Israel and have full representation in Knesset (parliament), free health insurance. free speech, free education. And this Durban (UN Human Rights Group conference) have the hipocrisy to say Israel is racist. I wonder wether this guys will learn to be loyal to the truth. Millions of arabs are oppressed by arab regimes with its kings who are feeding their bank accounts with oil revenues, and leavind their population in poverty, and opression. They don't like Israel because imagine if these arabs had the same right as they have in Israel, they would topple their dictators and think freely like the West, who praise self esteem instead of fascist colective ego.
O desafio de assumir o ego individual no mundo fundamentalista islâmico
O Iran aparece como uma compensação para os islâmicos fundamentalistas, cuja autoestima vem sendo destruida por décadas de regime ditatorial. Fica muito fácil se aliar a uma facção nazifacista que promove o ego coletivo e usa o tradicional conceito do suposto inimigo exógeno chamado de ocidente incluindo principalmente Israel e EUA.
As classes sociais menos favorecidas no mundo árabe ganham um caminho oficial para se opor aos regimes ditatoriais, os famosos ricos reis árabes. Encontram na democracia turca, homologada pelo ocidente, uma chance de oficialmente gritar contra as forças invisíveis, psíquicas, que colocam a autoestima para baixo. "-Agora sou um islâmico contra o mundo de fora e não preciso mais arcar com a pesada tarefa de assumir eu mesmo como indivíduo" - grita o radical islâmico. A morte suicida, "ser um shahid" é o suprasumo da expressão em se auto destruir, colocar uma bomba e se suicidar, destruindo a si mesmo, novamente, uma prova de que fica difícil suportar o ego individual.
A Turquia, apoiando e realizando em seu território as reuniões dos terroristas do Hamas, participando da convenção terrorista de Doha junto com o Irã, Síria e Hamas, a atitude de Erodgan em Davos, os comentários oficiais de Erodgan contra Israel em relação a operação em Gaza, demonstra que o radicalismo islâmico encontra espaço para crescer. A Turquia de repente esqueceu que a operação israelense em Gaza visava acabar com os 8 anos de lançamentos de mísseis do Hamas contra civis israelenses que mataram e feriram ao longo destes anos milhares de civis israelenses de forma indiscriminada.
As classes sociais menos favorecidas no mundo árabe ganham um caminho oficial para se opor aos regimes ditatoriais, os famosos ricos reis árabes. Encontram na democracia turca, homologada pelo ocidente, uma chance de oficialmente gritar contra as forças invisíveis, psíquicas, que colocam a autoestima para baixo. "-Agora sou um islâmico contra o mundo de fora e não preciso mais arcar com a pesada tarefa de assumir eu mesmo como indivíduo" - grita o radical islâmico. A morte suicida, "ser um shahid" é o suprasumo da expressão em se auto destruir, colocar uma bomba e se suicidar, destruindo a si mesmo, novamente, uma prova de que fica difícil suportar o ego individual.
A Turquia, apoiando e realizando em seu território as reuniões dos terroristas do Hamas, participando da convenção terrorista de Doha junto com o Irã, Síria e Hamas, a atitude de Erodgan em Davos, os comentários oficiais de Erodgan contra Israel em relação a operação em Gaza, demonstra que o radicalismo islâmico encontra espaço para crescer. A Turquia de repente esqueceu que a operação israelense em Gaza visava acabar com os 8 anos de lançamentos de mísseis do Hamas contra civis israelenses que mataram e feriram ao longo destes anos milhares de civis israelenses de forma indiscriminada.
O absurdo da agenda de Durban II: insulta Israel de racista e estado colonialista?
Estou de saco cheio com esta hipocrisia. 1 milhão de árabes israelenses votam em Israel tem representação plena no parlamento israelense, a Knesset, recebem seguro de saúde e educação grátis, e podem se expressar livremente. Onde está este racismo??? E esta convenção de direitos humanos da ONU, Durban II, a ser realizada em breve na Suiça, tem a hipocrisia de chamar Israel de racista. Eu duvido que esta turma vai aprender a ser leal com a verdade. Milhões de árabes são oprimidos pelos regimes árabes, com seus reis e ditadores enchendo suas contas bancárias com os lucros do petróleo, enquanto a população do mundo árabe vive na ignorância, pobreza e opressão. O mundo árabe não gosta de Israel pois imagine...se estes árabes nos países muçulmanos tivessem os mesmos direitos da grande democracia israelense? Eles iriam derrubar seus ditadores, e pensar livremente como o ocidente, que prega a auto estima no lugar do ego coletivo facista.
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)
